Legal Opinion
United States v. Devery
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1996No. 93 Crim. 273 (LAP)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
PRESKA, District Judge:
After an eight-week trial in which they were found guilty of conspiring to violate federal money laundering laws, defendants Joseph Devery and Joaquin Rivera have moved, under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 29 and 33, for a judgment setting aside the verdict or for a new trial. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motions are denied.
BACKGROUND
Defendants’ trial began on September 21, 1995 and ended on November 30, 1995. After eight days of deliberation, the jury convicted both defendants on Count I of the Indictment, which charged them with…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. CernoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. AiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. NosovDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Boger v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic PreservationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2019
- Bradshaw v. BurnsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.