United States v. Nosov
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Defendant Vasiliy Ermichine, joined by defendant Alexander Nosov, moves pursuant to Rule 33, F.R.Crim.P for a new trial on two grounds: 1) that the court improperly limited their cross-examination of a cooperating witness, Alexander Spitchen-ko, in violation of the Sixth Amendment and Rules 607 and 608, F.R. Evid.; and 2) that the court’s ex parte communications with certain jurors without counsel’s consent while the jury was deliberating violated defendants’ rights to a fair trial. Both grounds are without merit and defendants’ motion for a new trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- United States v. NosovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004