Legal Opinion

United States v. Nosov

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 17, 2002No. S3 00 CR. 314(RLC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Defendant Vasiliy Ermichine, joined by defendant Alexander Nosov, moves pursuant to Rule 33, F.R.Crim.P for a new trial on two grounds: 1) that the court improperly limited their cross-examination of a cooperating witness, Alexander Spitchen-ko, in violation of the Sixth Amendment and Rules 607 and 608, F.R. Evid.; and 2) that the court’s ex parte communications with certain jurors without counsel’s consent while the jury was deliberating violated defendants’ rights to a fair trial. Both grounds are without merit and defendants’ motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Edmund M. AutuoriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. United States v. NosovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API