Legal Opinion
Lund v. Chemical Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1992No. 84 Civ. 1621 (RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Russell T. Lund, Jr. (“Lund”) and Wardwell M. Montgomery (“Montgomery”) seek in this diversity action to recover from defendant Chemical Bank (“Chemical”) for the amounts of two checks dated March 9, 1981, drawn on Chemical (the “Checks”). The Checks, one in the amount of $716,946 and the other for $46,056, were fraudulently negotiated by William T. Rubin (“Rubin”). As set forth in the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, because Lund and Montgomery failed to mitigated their damages and because they are equitably estopped, their complaints…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hechter v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Wagner Trading Co. v. Battery Park National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Putnam Rolling Ladder Co. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pamar Enterprises, Inc. v. Huntington BanksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mouradian v. Astoria Federal Savings & LoanNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Zambia National Commercial Bank Ltd. v. Fidelity International BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Hyosung America, Inc. v. Sumagh Textile Co., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Optopics Laboratories Corp. v. Savannah Bank of Nigeria, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.