Legal Opinion

Gerhardt v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided November 20, 1996No. 09-95-002CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

A jury convicted Carl Nicholas Gerhardt of indecency with a child. The trial judge assessed punishment at seventeen years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional Division. Gerhardt raises five points of error. We will discuss the points in chronological order, except the insufficient evidence point.

Point of error three alleges the evidence is insufficient in that the State failed to prove the requisite intent, that is, that Gerhardt acted with the intent to arouse or gratify his sexual desire. The standard of review of the sufficiency…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Ethington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Duvall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002
  2. Tyler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Jarvis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2010
  4. Westmoreland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2005
  5. Harrelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API