Legal Opinion

Harrelson v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided September 4, 2008No. 09-04-005 CR, 09-04-006 CR, 09-04-007 CR, 09-04-008 CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DON BURGESS, Justice.

OPINION

A jury convicted Janet Harrelson of the following offenses: abuse of official capacity (Trial Cause No. 24,514, Appeal Cause No. 09-04-005 CR); forgery (Trial Cause No. 24,515, Appeal Cause No. 09-04-006 CR); and two charges of tampering with a governmental record (Trial Cause Nos. 24,516 and 24, 518, Appeal Cause Nos. 09-04-007 CR and 09-04-008 CR). The trial court sentenced Harrelson as follows: (1) for abuse of official capacity-sixty days’ confinement in the Liberty County Jail, $318 in court costs, and $880 in restitution; (2) for forgery — ten years’…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Bone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Janet Harrelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2007
  2. Raul Garza Salazar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  3. Salazar, Raul GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. William Albert Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API