Legal Opinion

The State Bar v. Hull

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1930No. Docket No. 6764PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In the year 1915 respondent Hull obtained from the Supreme Court of Indiana an order admitting him to practice law in that state. Said order has never been vacated or set aside. In the year 1920 and while respondent was practicing law in the state of Indiana an indictment was found and returned in the District Court of the United States, for the district of Indiana, against respondent Hull and one Heldt, an officer of a bank at Evansville. In the indictment it was charged that Heldt, as assistant cashier of the bank, fraudulently and feloniously, and with intent to injure the bank, wilfully…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re MashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spears v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Rinaldo v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Hartman v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Petition of WatersNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re HyraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API