In Re Hyra
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentVanderbilt, C. J.
Rrom the earliest days in this State it has been a rule of court that “No person [shall] be admitted to such examination [to practice as an attorney at law], unless he * * * shall be of good moral character.” 1 N. J. L. vi. Rule 3. The rule is not peculiar to New Jersey; it is a universal requirement, for good moral character is the first requirement of the profession, compared with which learning and diligence are of secondary importance. Accordingly we find our former Supreme Court holding:
“If it appear by the record of conviction that an applicant had been convicted of larceny, the court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of RoussNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- In Re the Admission of WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re MashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- In Re HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- The State Bar v. HullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.