Legal Opinion

Lewinsohn v. Kent & Stanley Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Adolph Lewinsohn against the Kent & Stanley Company. From an order denying a motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, William G. McGrath, a junior attaching creditor, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

A motion was made by a subsequent lienor and junior attaching creditor to vacate, upon the papers on which it was granted, a warrant of attachment issued in plaintiff’s favor against defendant. The plaintiff, against objection, was permitted to read in opposition the judgment roll, showing that his attachment had merged into a judgment. The two grounds urged upon this appeal for reversal are that it was error to permit the plaintiff, in opposition to'the motion to vacate, to read and present the judgment roll in this action; and, second, that the affidavit upon which the warrant of attachment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marsh v. FalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Ladenburg v. Commercial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Steuben County Bank v. . AlbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Trow's Printing & Bookbinding Co. v. HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Yates v. . NorthNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. California Packing Corp. v. Kelly Storage & Distributing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Grassi v. La Sociedad Bancaria Del ChimborazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. Patton v. PattonNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Stern v. EichbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API