Legal Opinion

Stern v. Eichberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 22, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, on promissory notes. Trial in the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff; error by defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Windes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendants in error, who are executors of the last will and testament of Samuel Eichberg, deceased, brought assumpsit against plaintiff in error, declaring specially upon fifteen promissory notes of divers amounts, payable “ to estate of Samuel Eichberg,” becoming due at divers dates, with interest, and also in the common counts. Plaintiff in error pleaded the general issue and two special pleas. Demurrer was sustained to the special pleas, and on a trial before the court and a jury, the court instructed a verdict for defendants…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blackman v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Lyon v. MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Lewinsohn v. Kent & Stanley Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Peltier v. BabillionMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Tittle v. ThomasMississippi Supreme Court · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bacher v. City Nat. Bk., Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Hansen v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API