Dye v. Peterson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHMER, Commissioner.
This is a suit for personal injuries. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the Court directed a verdict and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.
It is plaintiff’s theory and her petition charges that defendant failed to provide her with a safe place in which to work and negligently placed rolls of linoleum close to an aisle along which she walked, and that a roll of linoleum fell upon and injured her. Defendant introduced no evidence and contends, (a) that defendant was not guilty of negligence; (b) that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence;…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paubel v. HitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Woodson v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Stein v. Battenfield Oil & Grease Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Miller v. FW Woolworth CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Cool v. Curtis-Wright, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haire v. StagnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Leathem v. LongeneckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- McTurman v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Piepmeyer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Mr. And Mrs. Wilson Mowry, Jr. v. Mr. And Mrs. Ernest SchmollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971