Legal Opinion

Dye v. Peterson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1961No. 23360PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHMER, Commissioner.

This is a suit for personal injuries. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the Court directed a verdict and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

It is plaintiff’s theory and her petition charges that defendant failed to provide her with a safe place in which to work and negligently placed rolls of linoleum close to an aisle along which she walked, and that a roll of linoleum fell upon and injured her. Defendant introduced no evidence and contends, (a) that defendant was not guilty of negligence; (b) that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence;…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paubel v. HitzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Woodson v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Stein v. Battenfield Oil & Grease Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Miller v. FW Woolworth CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Cool v. Curtis-Wright, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haire v. StagnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Leathem v. LongeneckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. McTurman v. BellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Piepmeyer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Mr. And Mrs. Wilson Mowry, Jr. v. Mr. And Mrs. Ernest SchmollCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API