Legal Opinion
Munich Reinsurance Co. v. First Reinsurance Co. of Hartford
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 6, 1925No. 166PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The question which this case raises is whether a German corporation, which during the World War was an alien enemy, is entitled, now that the war has been terminated, to maintain a suit for an accounting against a domestic corporation, to which the Alien Property Custodian paid, out of proceeds realized by a sale of the latter’s shares of stock in the former, a claim against the German corporation, and which had been seized and sold by him as enemy property by virtue of the powers vested in him by law, which also authorized him to liquidate claims against…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ware v. HyltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
- United States v. PerchemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Carson v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schmieder v. HallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Klein v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Gmo. Niehaus & Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- The Taigen MaruCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Van Der Weyde v. Ocean Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.