Legal Opinion

Gmo. Niehaus & Co. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 17, 1967No. 501-56PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM: *

I

The plaintiffs in this action seek to recover compensation for the vesting by the Attorney General of the United States on July 26, 1951, under the Trading With the Enemy Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. §§ 1-40 (1946)), of $76,535.83 in cash and also negotiable securities having a market value of more than $500,000 on the date mentioned. At the time of the vesting, the cash and securities in question were on deposit with the National City Bank and the Chase National Bank of New York City, which held the assets in accounts maintained under the name of Gmo. Niehaus & Co., a…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Clapp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp., AGSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. R. Ribas Y Hijo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. J. Robert Bonnar v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  4. J. Robert Bonnar v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API