Legal Opinion
Chicago Ry. Equipment Co. v. Superior Charcoal Iron Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1926No. 4147PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenison, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The questions presented to this court are: Whether the seller had broken the contract by its early nondeliveries; whether, if so, the buyer had waived any *236rights thereby resulting to it; whether a valid new contract had been made for delivery after January 1st; and whether interest should be allowed. We have recently had occasion to consider in different aspects several of these installment delivery contracts, and have sufficiently discussed their characteristics and effect. Consolidation Co. v. Peninsular Co., 272 F. 625; Everett v. Emmons Co., 289 F. 686,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Peninsular Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Kalamazoo Ice & Fuel Co. v. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Herman H. Hettler Lumber Co. v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Gerber v. Borderland Coal Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The Beryllium Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Crown Industries, Inc. v. Boyertown Burial Casket CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- (PC) Walker v. WalkerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Crown Industries, Inc. v. Boyertown Burial Casket CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.