Consolidation Coal Co. v. Peninsular Portland Cement Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern. District of Michigan; Arthur J. Tuttle, Judge. Action-by the Peninsular Portland Cement Company against the Consolidation Coal Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
On April 11, 1916, the Peninsular Portland Cement Company, of Jackson, Mich., contracted with the Consolidation Coal Company of Baltimore, Md., for the purchase of “55,000 to 60,000 tons of Consolidation Fairmont slack coal, less such amount as said Coal Company is unable to ship or Peninsular Portland Cement Company is unable to receive, on account of any strikes, accidents, contingencies of transportation or navigation, or causes beyond the control of either party affecting the shipment, delivery, or receipt of coal to be shipped under this contract,” shipments to be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Day v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Garfield & Proctor Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Bain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Jessup & Moore Paper Co. v. PiperU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Deupree v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
- Boehmer Coal Co. v. Burton Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Shawano Canning Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Chicago Ry. Equipment Co. v. Superior Charcoal Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.