Legal Opinion
Druckman v. Forsyth Furniture Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1927No. 2629PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERNEST F. COCHRAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error was the defendant, and the defendant in error the plaintiff, in the District Court. They will be referred to as they appeared in that court, namely, as plaintiff and defendant respectively.
The plaintiff brought this action in 1920 for damages for the breach of a contract for the sale of certain property. The damages claimed were the difference between the agreed and tbe market price. The case was tried in the District Court, and the court directed a verdict for the defendant; but upon a writ of error this court reversed that judgment…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wicker v. HoppockSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carl I. Latham, Jr. v. Crofters, Inc., Carl I. Latham, Jr. v. Crofters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Hunnewell v. HunnewellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Fruit Growers' Express Co. v. Plate Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- McDonnell v. TabahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- McDONNELL v. TABAHCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.