Legal Opinion

Howard v. Georgia Power Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 22, 1934No. 23478PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. While, as a general rule, allegations of fact are to be construed most strongly against the pleader, yet, in the absence of a special demurrer, where the facts alleged in a petition are such as would be proper and adequate to support one form of action, but inadequate, although appropriate, to another form of action, and where the petition is ambiguous to the extent that the pleader’s intention is not clearly manifest as to which form of action is relied upon, the courts in such a case, -in endeavoring to ascertain the plaintiff’s intention, will prima facie presume that his purpose was to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. Dublin Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Stoddard v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Payne v. RiversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Hood v. Atlantic Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Minchew v. HustonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Powell v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Hearing v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Jones v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Minchew v. HustonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API