Legal Opinion

British Midland Airways Limited v. International Travel, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1974No. 73-2994PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNS, District Judge:

This action was brought to enforce a judgment obtained in the High Court of Justice in England. The District Court found the British judgment to be valid and enforceable. We agree and affirm.

Plaintiff-Appellee, British Midland Airways Limited (BMA), a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, and Defendant-Appellant, International Travel, Inc. (International), a Washington corporation, entered into a contract on May 14, 1971, providing for an agency to arrange charter flights from the western United States and Canada to England. In Clause 12 of that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Alberta Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Naoko Ohno v. Yuko YasumaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. The Society of Lloyd's v. James Frederick AshendenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Bird v. Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark v. Pacific-Peru Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith v. Prometco (Prod. & Metals)District Court, S.D. New York · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API