British Midland Airways Limited v. International Travel, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BURNS, District Judge:
This action was brought to enforce a judgment obtained in the High Court of Justice in England. The District Court found the British judgment to be valid and enforceable. We agree and affirm.
Plaintiff-Appellee, British Midland Airways Limited (BMA), a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom, and Defendant-Appellant, International Travel, Inc. (International), a Washington corporation, entered into a contract on May 14, 1971, providing for an agency to arrange charter flights from the western United States and Canada to England. In Clause 12 of that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Alberta Lumber Co. v. Pioneer Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by34 opinions
- Naoko Ohno v. Yuko YasumaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- The Society of Lloyd's v. James Frederick AshendenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Bird v. Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark v. Pacific-Peru Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Fairchild, Arabatzis & Smith v. Prometco (Prod. & Metals)District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.