Legal Opinion

Watters v. Otter

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided February 26, 2012No. Case No. 1:12-CV-76-BLWPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*825MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it Occupy Boise’s motion for injunctive relief. The Court heard oral argument on the motion on February 24, 2012, and took the motion under advisement. For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant the motion, to the extent it seeks to enjoin the state from removing the symbolic tent city erected by Occupy Boise, but deny the motion, to the extent it seeks to enjoin the occupants from camping, sleeping or storing camping-related personal property at the site.

SUMMARY

Occupy Boise’s motion for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bloem v. Unknown Department of the Interior EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Mitchell v. City of New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Catherine Bailey & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. Idaho State University Faculty Ass'n for the Preservation of the First Amendment v. Idaho State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2012
  5. Watters v. OtterDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API