Meyer v. Saul
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from an order of Circuit Court No. 2, of Baltimore City (Wickes, J.), overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
On the 22d of November, 1889, the appellant, his wife and another entered into an agreement with the appellee for *460the purchase by him of the right to manufacture and sell the preparations known as “ Old Saul’s Catarrh Cure,” and “ Old Saul’s Pile Ointment,” together with all the material on hand, including all the receipts and fixtures used in their manufacture, and all other matters and things connected with the business of manufacturing and selling said remedies. In consideration of said sale to the appellant, he agrees to pay the appellee $125 for the stock on hand, materials, receipts,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Belt v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Hecht v. ColquhounCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Noble v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles County Broadcasting Co. v. MearesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Leathers v. StewartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
- Miller v. HorowitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Pollard & Haw v. American Stone Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1910
- Montebello Land Co. v. Frank Novak Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.