Pollard & Haw v. American Stone Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the defendant on the question now in dispute. Plaintiffs assign error.
1Opinion of the Court
Whittle J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiffs in error brought assumpsit against the defendant in error to recover $1,207.75 to January Eules, 1909, and caused a copy of the account to be served with the summons. There was no appearance at rules on behalf of the defendant, though counsel addressed a letter to the clerk requesting that they be marked as such. It is the rule of the court, on the first day of each term, to sound the docket, and all cases in which requests are made are set for trial on specified days. Accordingly, on the first day of the February term, when this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dorr v. CamdenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
- Meyer v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- James v. GottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ewing v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Nicholls v. AndersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Carpenter v. GraySupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Ciccarello v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1940
- L. E. Mumford Banking Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of KilmarnockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.