Legal Opinion

Reinert v. California Almond Growers Exchange

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1937No. L. A. No. 15137PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Questions concerning the rights and obligations of parties to a cooperative marketing agreement are presented by this case in which the appellant seeks an accounting of transactions with the respondent exchange during a period of eight years. In addition to the demand for a general accounting the appellant challenges the right of the exchange to make certain deductions for reserves and working capital and other charges. The trial court adopted an account submitted by the exchange and found that there was nothing presently due and payable to appellant at either the time of the commencement of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. Little Falls Dairy Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. Rhodes v. Little Falls Dairy Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Arkansas Cotton Growers' Co-Operative Ass'n v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  4. Johnson v. Staple Cotton Co-Op. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. San Joaquin Valley Poultry Producers' Ass'n v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. Bowles v. Inland Empire Dairy Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943
  3. Whipple v. HaberleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Andrews Farms v. Calcot, Ltd.District Court, E.D. California · 2009
  5. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API