Legal Opinion

State v. Miura

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1986No. 11262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

In a case charging defendant Daniel T. Miura (Defendant) with the offense of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor, plaintiff State of Hawaii (State) appeals from the district court’s “Order Granting in Part Motion to Suppress Evidence.” Defendant contends the order was not appealable under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-13(7) (Supp. 1984) and this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. We agree and dismiss the appeal.. After a not guilty plea, Defendant filed a “Motion to Suppress Evidence of Driving Under Influence of Intoxicating Liquor.” The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. O'BRIENHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. O'BRIENHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. BikleHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. JohnsonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OshiroHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Kobashigawa v. Silva.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Barcai v. BetweeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Barcai v. BetweeHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API