Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barcai v. Betwee

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2002No. 21486Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion of

ACOBA, J.,

with whom RAMIL, J., joins.

I concur in the result reached but on different grounds. In my view, the following general propositions apply in a case of this nature. On appeal from any modification or reversal of a motion in limine ruling, the question before the appellate court is whether any prejudice was suffered by the party that relied on the original ruling, requiring a new trial. When ruling on a motion in li-mine, the trial court must ascertain whether any determination can appropriately be made before trial. If such can be rendered, the court should so…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dawson v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Leonard Joseph YannottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API