Kalina v. Eckert
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
In this action in equity to enforce an agreement for the sale of real estate, the trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the sellers. The buyer, the court held, had forfeited his rights under the agreement of sale because a formal mortgage commitment had been obtained two days after the date required by the agreement. 1 We reverse.
In determining whether summary judgment is proper, a court must examine the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and all doubt must be resolved against the entry of such a judgment. Pocono International Raceway, Inc.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Straup v. Times HeraldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McCausland v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Liazis v. Kosta, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Quinn v. BuppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Cambria-Stoltz Enterprises v. TNT InvestmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Hoelscher v. SchenewerkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.