Legal Opinion

Hoelscher v. Schenewerk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1991No. WD 43296PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GAITAN, Judge.

This appeal arises from a breach of contract action involving the sale of real estate. Respondents, Clarence and Mildred Hoelscher (plaintiffs or sellers), obtained a judgment against appellants, Dale and Sharon Schenewerk (defendants or buyers), for damages resulting from defendants’ failure to fulfill a contractual obligation to purchase a home. Defendants appeal from this judgment alleging that the trial court erred in: (1) failing to find the contract invalid under the financing contingency clause; (2) awarding both the earnest money and damages to plaintiffs; and (3)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Groppel Co. v. United States Gypsum Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Herbert & Brooner Construction Co. v. GoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Norden v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Hart v. MidkiffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Howard v. YoungmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Gilmartin Bros., Inc. v. KernMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Warstler v. CibrianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Turner v. ShalbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API