Legal Opinion

Urich v. Fox

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1984No. 84-30PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

This case, a suit upon three promissory notes, was set for trial upon five days notice. A request for continuance was denied. The trial was held as scheduled with neither appellant nor his counsel being present. This appeal is from the judgment entered following the trial.

Appellant states the issues as:

“1. Whether the trial judge abused his discretion by denying Appellant’s motion for a continuance when the Appellant had only five days notice of the trial setting and his expert witness was unavailable to testify because he had been subpoenaed in another case set for trial on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cates v. EddyWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Holly Sugar Corporation v. PerezWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Winkelman v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Sapp v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hance v. StraatsmaWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Byrd v. MahaffeyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Weisbrod v. ElyWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dollarhide v. BancroftWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Engle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API