Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Mahaffey

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2003No. 02-261PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶1] Ronald Howard Byrd appeals the district court's decision allowing his counsel of record to withdraw from representing him prior to trial. Byrd also contests the district court's subsequent refusal to grant him a continuance of the trial date. Upon review, we affirm. '

ISSUES

[¶2] Byrd sets forth the following iésues on appeal:

I. Did the trial court commit reversible error when it allowed appellant's counsel to withdraw eight (8) business days before trial?

II. Did the trial court's denial of appellant's motion for continuance to obtain new counsel after the court had allowed…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. McGuire v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Rocky Mountain Oil and Gas Ass'n v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Cates v. EddyWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Christine M. Grunewald, Individually and as of the Will of Henry W. Grunewald, Deceased v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kathy S. Crofts v. State of Wyoming, ex rel., Department of Game and FishWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Abraham v. Great Western Energy, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Adoption of AdaWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Magin v. Solitude Homeowner's Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Northwest Building Co. v. Northwest Distributing Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API