Legal Opinion

Transit Commission v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 10, 1933No. 535PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butlee

Each appellant sued the United States and the railroad companies to set aside an order made by the Interstate Commerce Commission under § 1 (18) of the Interstate Commerce Act. The Commission intervened. .The order certifies that the present and future public convenience and necessity require that upon terms specified the Long Island continue to operate over tracks, and to share in the ■use of other facilities, of the Pennsylvania Tunnel and Terminal Railroad Company. Appellants applied for a temporary injunction, the eases were consolidated, the ■ evidence before the Commission was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Railroad Commission of California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. City of Auburn v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API