Legal Opinion

Reese v. Day

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 1955No. Civ. 16209PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

This is an appeal from judgments of non-suit in favor of defendants Mary Day, executrix of the estate of Anthony H. Day, deceased, and Emile Komstheoft in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff and appellant John I. Reese in an automobile collision.

Anthony Day was the driver of the car in which appellant Reese was riding as a guest at the time it collided with a pickup truck driven by respondent Komstheoft. Appellant’s action against the Day estate was founded on wilful misconduct under the guest statute; the action against Komstheoft, on simple negligence.

The accident…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hawaiian Pineapple Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Wright v. SellersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Strnod v. AbadieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Carmean v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Munson v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API