Carmean v. Bridges
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
These actions were brought by respondents against appellant Bridges based on alleged wilful misconduct whereby respondents, who were guests in appellant’s automobile, were injured. The two cases were consolidated and tried to the court sitting without a jury. The court rendered judgments in favor of the plaintiffs and Bridges appeals.
The two respondents were minors who were serving in the United States Navy. They had been hitch-hiking. Near Gilroy they were picked up by appellant who was eastbound and traveling alone along Highway 152 which crosses over the Pacheco Pass and into the San…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Wright v. SellersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Hallman v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lightenburger v. GordonNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Wagner v. OsbornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Strnod v. AbadieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Warren v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Munson v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.