Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Tata Consulting Services

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 20, 2025No. 4:17-cv-00072Unknown

1Opinion

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex § rel. JACK “JAY” PALMER, § § Plaintiff, § § Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-72 v. § Judge Mazzant § TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, § LTD., § § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Tata Consultancy Services Limited’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Qui Tam Complaint (Dkt. #65). Having considered the Motion, the relevant pleadings, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. BACKGROUND This is a qui tam action. The Complaint, initiated by…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. Gonzalez v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States Ex Rel. Grubbs v. KannegantiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API