Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Garcia

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 28, 2006No. 02CV460-BENPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TERMINATING CASE [Docket No. 131]

BENITEZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff Dale Hurd (“Hurd” or “Plaintiff’), a prisoner at Calipatria State Prison, has filed a pro se Third Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 against prison officials Warden Garcia, Captain W.J. Price, Lieutenant R. Anti, Sergeant Richards, and Correctional Officers Does 1-10. Hurd claims that the conditions of his confinement at Calipatria during a lock down of the facility from December 2001 to March 2002 violated his…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Norwood v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Norwood v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Norwood v. WoodfordDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2008
  4. Norwood v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. (PC) Bland v. MoffettDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API