Legal Opinion

State v. Locklear

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1983No. 8216SC698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends he was denied due process rights when the court intimidated the State’s principal witness, the victim of *525the alleged crime, by threatening her with confinement for contempt and prosecution for perjury. Under the circumstances presented we find no error.

Defendant was indicted for discharging a firearm into a trailer while it was occupied by the State’s principal witness. He had been living with the witness, although he was married to someone else. A short time before the shooting incident he had indicated he did not want to see the witness any more. At trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API