Legal Opinion

State v. Locklear

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1983No. 114PA83Published

1Opinion of the Court

306 S.E.2d 774 (1983)

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Philip James LOCKLEAR.

No. 114PA83.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 27, 1983.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Donald W. Grimes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the state.

Adam Stein, Appellate Defender by Lorinzo L. Joyner, Asst. Appellate Defender, Raleigh, for defendant.

MARTIN, Justice.

We find prejudicial error with respect to defendant's first assignment of error and, therefore, reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. In this assignment defendant argues that he was deprived of due process of law by the actions of the trial court…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API