Kirts v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
Phillip Kirts appeals his conviction for speeding following a jury trial, a Class C Infraction. Ind. Code § 9-21-5-2 (1993) and Ind. Code § 9-21-5-13 (1993). At the close of the State’s case in chief, Kirts moved to dismiss the complaint because the speeding ticket did not contain the signature of the court clerk, attesting that the police officer issuing the ticket had sworn to it in the clerk’s presence, as required by statute. Ind. Code § 9-30-3-6 (1993). The trial court denied Kirts’ motion to dismiss, and the sole issue Kirts presents for review is whether the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
- McGowan v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Thurman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Wine v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Jennings v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stroud v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Fields v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hamill v. City of CarmelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hugo Torres v. City of HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Kirts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.