Legal Opinion
Jennings v. Davis
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 4, 1995No. 35A05-9311-CV-419PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTEAU, Judge.
By published opinion, we dismissed Jennings appeal because the praecipe was filed one day late. Jennings v. Davis (1994), Ind.App., 634 N.E.2d 810. Jennings petitions for rehearing on the following grounds:(1) the time period for timely filing the praecipe was extended three days pursuant to Trial Rule 6 because he received notice of the trial court’s judgment by mail;
*24(2) because this court prefers hearing cases on the merits, he should be allowed to pursue his appeal given that another praecipe he mailed to the trial court for filing in the same envelope and under the same…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claywell v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Employment & Training ServicesIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Costanzi v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Annon II, Inc. v. RillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jennings v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Meyer v. Northern Indiana Bank and Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- McDillon v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Sneed v. Associated Group InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Vaughn v. SchnitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kirts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jennings v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.