Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. State Ex Rel. Bailey

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1937No. 7 Div. 271Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

It appears from the record in this case that the State, on relation of H. G. Bailey, as the circuit solicitor, instituted proceedings in the nature of quo warranto against R. M. Ferguson, appellant. The information charges that the respondent, “in said DeKalb county, Alabama, has intruded himself into the profession of treating or offering to treat diseases of human beings, which is a profession requiring a license or certificate of qualification from the State Board of Medical Examiners of the State of Alabama, or the license required by law, and is still at the time…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Brown v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Reed v. Ridout's Ambulance, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Harris v. State Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Merriam v. HamiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API