Legal Opinion

Christina J. Greenfield v. Ian D. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2017No. Docket 43831PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRODY, Justice.

This is a legal malpractice case that addresses the statute of limitations applicable to professional malpractice claims, how a statute of limitations is calculated when the last day for filing a complaint falls on a Sunday, and whether expert testimony is necessary to establish the prima facie elements of legal malpractice. Greenfield appeals the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the attorney. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Greenfield hii-ed Smith in September 2010 to represent her in a civil suit against her neighbors, Eric and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Nelson v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kolln v. Saint Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lapham v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ciccarello v. DaviesIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Turcott v. Estate of BatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Thumm v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Estate of Stahl v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Rome v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2018

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API