Legal Opinion

Minert v. HARSCO CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 21, 1980No. 7357-5-IPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

—Plaintiff Minert brought a personal injury suit based on strict liability in tort. He appeals from a jury verdict for defendant. Defendant cross appeals. We affirm.

Issues

1. Was the jury correctly instructed as to the elements of strict liability?

2. Was there sufficient evidence of "assumption of risk" to present that issue to the jury?

3. Was the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act regulations (WISHA) or the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations (OSHA) properly before the jury?

4. Is the doctrine of "superseding cause" appropriate to a strict liability in tort action?

Fa…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Little v. PPG Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. McCullough Ex Rel. McCulloughKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bryant v. Technical Research Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Campbell v. ITE Imperial Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API