Taylor v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 Manufacturers have a duty to provide warnings to consumers about the risks of their products pursuant to the Washington product liability act (WPLA), chapter 7.72 RCW. In this case, a manufacturer sold a surgical device to a hospital, which credentialed some of its physicians to perform surgery with the device. The manufacturer’s warnings regarding that device are at the heart of this case. We are asked to decide whether the manufacturer owed a duty to warn the hospital that purchased the device. The manufacturer argues that since it warned the physician who performed the surgery, it had…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hendrickson v. Moses Lake Sch. Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 2018
- Diana & Mark Sherman v. Pliva, Inc, Teva PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Ada Motors, Inc., Dba Burien Toyota, Res. v. David L. Butler, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Kerry L. Erickson, V. Pharmacia Llc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- State v. YelovichWashington Supreme Court · 2018
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.