Legal Opinion
Case v. Pinnick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 7, 1939No. 29245PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action in mandamus by L. D. Pinnick to compel Jeff Case, county treasurer of Atoka county, to pay a township warrant owned by the plaintiff. From an order granting a peremptory writ of mandamus, the defendant appeals.
The warrant was issued and registered on July 6, 1931. Funds were not then available to pay it. On April 15, 1938, plaintiff demanded payment of the warrant, and at that time funds were available to pay it, but payment was refused because of the provisions of article 7, ch. 32, S. L. 1935, 62 Okla. St. Ann. § 482, effective May 8, 1935. That statute provides:
“That from…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- State Ex Rel. Board of Ed. v. MorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Sulphur v. State Ex Rel. Lankford, Bank Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ex Parte HiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Baccus v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Love v. SilverthornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Street v. Bethany Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Funnell v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.