Legal Opinion

Love v. Silverthorn

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 27, 1940No. 29686PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

This action involves the constitutionality of the Intangible Tax Law, art. 4, ch. 66, S. L. 1939. It was brought by plaintiff, Love, against de fendant, Silverthorn, county treasurer of Lincoln county, for a writ of mandamus commanding the defendant to accept, on a promissory note held by plaintiff, tax as required by section 12363, O. S. 1931, 68 Okla. St. Ann. § 511, and certify on such note its exemption from all other taxes as required by that section. Defendant refused to accept the tax or so certify the note, and in his response to the alternative writ justified his refusal on the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Gross Production Tax of Wolverine Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Trustees', Executors' & Securities Ins. v. HootonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Lutz, Atty.-Gen. v. Arnold, Atty. Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Tax Commission v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Nelson v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. County Board of Equalization v. Muskogee Industrial Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. 1010.61 Acres of Land, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HulbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Ray Ex Rel. Schulte v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API