United States v. Priest
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Ferguson, Judge:
We are concerned in this case with whether the pretrial activities of the law officer, specifically a conference he had with the staff judge advocate concerning Additional Charge I and its specification,1 disqualified him from further participation in the trial.
During an out-of-court hearing to inquire into a plea of guilty to all of the charges and specifications, the law officer stated:
“. . . We’ll pass then to Additional Charge I which alleges a violation of paragraph 8 of USARV Regulation 210-5. This morning before we convened I read over USARV…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. RentonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. RiceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. ChaviraU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. PowellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970