Legal Opinion
Muller v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht Club
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 6, 1993No. 23959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chandler, Justice:
Appellant Charles R. Winters (Winters) appeals an Order denying his motion for attorney’s fees. We revere and remand.
FACTS
In 1988, Respondent William Muller (Muller) brought suit against Winters for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien and, alternatively, breach of contract and quantum meruit. In Circuit Court Muller prevailed and was awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 29-5-10 (1991) (mechanic’s lien statute).
Court of Appeals reversed this judgment. Muller v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht Club, 303 S.C. 137, 399 S.E. (2d) 430 (Ct. App. 1990), cert. dismissed, 305…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WyseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
- McDowell v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Muller v. Myrtle Beach Golf & Yacht ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Bowen & Smoot v. PlumleeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Hamm v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frasier v. Palmetto Homes of Florence, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Bunkum v. Manor PropertiesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Belton v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Ackerman v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.