Legal Opinion

Harling v. Buckland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1922No. 23,590PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal_ from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; William H. Mc-Camish, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiff, a taxpayer, brought this action to enjoin the board of county commissioners from constructing a courthouse and issuing bonds in payment thereof. The cause was submitted to the district court on the pleadings. The court refused to grant an injunction and rendered judgment in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The purpose of the action is to test the validity of chapter 155 of the Laws of 1921, which authorizes the board of county commissioners, in counties having a population of 110,000 or over, to construct or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Division of Howard CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Riley v. Township of GarfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  3. City of Belleville v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. KittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. State ex rel. White v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Smith v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. State ex rel. Griffith v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. STATE, EX REL. SHAW v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API