Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Hague

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1931No. 5710PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

—Respondent Carl G. Peterson brought this action to quiet title to certain real property situate at Lava Hot Springs, in Bannock county. On December 21, 1918, respondent and his wife, Ermina Peterson, executed their promissory note to the Lava Hot Springs State Bank for $600, and to secure the same executed a mortgage covering the property in controversy, which mortgage was duly recorded. Thereafter, on July 13, 1920, respondent was adjudged insane and confined to the State Asylum at Blackfoot. On December 30, 1921, he was paroled from said asylum but not discharged as cured. Thereafter, on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Crippen v. ChappelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Miller v. ProutIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Gile v. WoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Swann v. Sweetwater Irrigation & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Williams v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In Re the Welfare of HoutsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Barber v. Grand Summitt Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In Re Interest of BurbanksNebraska Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API