Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of Houts

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 7, 1972No. 1417-1PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, C.J.

Petitioners, Charlie L. and Patricia Houts, seek review by certiorari of a juvenile court order permanently depriving them of their son and daughter. At the time the order was entered their son was 3% years of age and their daughter 6 months of age. The controlling question presented is whether the hearing, resulting in the order of permanent deprivation, conformed to due process requirements. We hold it did not and reverse for a new trial.

In referring to the evidence in our statement of the case, we do so notwithstanding that much of it was received in the absence of Mr. and Mrs. Houts under…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Swindell-Dressler Corporation v. Honorable Edward Dumbaule, Judge of the United States District Court, Western District of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Graham v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Fresno City High School District v. DillonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Graves v. P. J. Taggares Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Department of Social & Health Services v. MoseleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Snyder v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. State v. FranulovichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API