Legal Opinion

Nealan v. Ring

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1919PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From Linn: George G. Bingham, Judge. In Banc. On motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal. The judgment was entered March 13, 1919. The notice of appeal was filed May 13, 1919. Section 550, L. O. L., as amended by subdivision 5, Chapter 319, Gen. Laws 1913, provides in substance that an appeal, if not taken in open court at the time of the rendition of the judgment or decree, shall be taken by serving and filing the notice of appeal within sixty days from the entry of the judgment or decree appealed from. Section 531, L. O. L., provides, among other matters, that—

‘ ‘ The time within which an act is to be done, as provided in this Code, shall…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HammelsyOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Hume v. Rogue River Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Pringle Falls Power Co. v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Tallmadge v. HooperOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  5. United States Nat. Bank v. SheflerOregon Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hoffart v. Lindquist & Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Beardsley v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Fry v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Wood v. School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API