State v. Tran
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.
I,Tam Tran was charged by bill of information with simple possession of cari-soprodol, which is scheduled controlled dangerous substance.1 Mr. Tran filed a motion to quash the charge under La. C.Cr.P. art. 532(10) because he claimed to have a valid prescription or order from a practitioner. Mr. Tran submitted a Patient’s History Report from Rite Aid which showed that Dr. Michael Hunter *673had prescribed carisoprodol on August 5, 2009. The prosecution submitted no countervailing evidence and merely noted its objection to the trial judge’s ruling which sustained or granted the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. LoveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- State v. SordenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. ArmsteadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. FranklinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. FranklinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. MarcelinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.