Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hawley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1888PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Lake County.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

The question of law upon which the rights of the parties mainly depend was settled on the former appeal. (Thompson v. Hawley, 14 Or. 199.) We there held that “by the terms of the contract pleaded by the defendant, he was bound to make a good and sufficient conveyance with full warranty only against my heirs, executors, and administrators. . If this was the agreement it bound the defendant to convey such title as he had, and such conveyance must contain the covenants contained in the writing. On the other hand, if the agreement is as set out in the complaint, it can only be performed by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. HawleyOregon Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. West v. Washington Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Lockhart v. FerreyOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Reed v. HollisterOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Whitney Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API